COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING
Derek Essery, Meckkey El-Sharnouby, Thomas P. Taylor
In the proceedings of: GeoOttawa 2017: 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conference; 12th joint with IAH-CNCSession: Transportation Geotechnics II - Roads A
Please include this code when submitting a data update: GEO2017_144
Access this article:
Canadian Geotechnical Society members can access to this article, along with all other Canadian Geotechnical Conference proceedings, in the Member Area. Conference proceedings are also available in many libraries.
Cite this article:
Derek Essery; Meckkey El-Sharnouby; Thomas P. Taylor (2017) COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING in GEO2017. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
@article{geo2017Paper144,
author = Derek Essery; Meckkey El-Sharnouby; Thomas P. Taylor,
title = COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING,
year = 2017
}
title = COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING,
year = 2017
}