COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING
Derek Essery, Meckkey El-Sharnouby, Thomas P. Taylor
Dans les comptes rendus d’articles de la conférence: GeoOttawa 2017: 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conference; 12th joint with IAH-CNCSession: Transportation Geotechnics II - Roads A
Please include this code when submitting a data update: GEO2017_144
Retrouver cet article:
Les membres de la Société canadienne de géotechnique peuvent accéder à cet article, ainsi qu'à tous les autres articles de la Conférence Géotechnique Canadienne, dans le Espace membre. Les comptes rendus d'articles sont également disponibles dans de nombreuses bibliothèques.
Citer cet article:
Derek Essery; Meckkey El-Sharnouby; Thomas P. Taylor (2017) COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING in GEO2017. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
@article{geo2017Paper144,
author = Derek Essery; Meckkey El-Sharnouby; Thomas P. Taylor,
title = COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING,
year = 2017
}
title = COMPARISON BETWEEN AASHTO AND CHBDC DESIGN METHODS FOR MSE RETAINING WALL FOR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING,
year = 2017
}