Comparative study of several methods of axial design of piles located in a thick clay deposit: Pierre-de-Saurel wind farm case
Merouane Menaa, Noureddine Ghlamallah
In the proceedings of: GeoSt. John's 2019: 72nd Canadian Geotechnical ConferenceSession: Pile Foundations
ABSTRACT: As part of a wind farm construction project, several methods of piles axial design were used to optimize pile costs. These methods include: Beta method (effective stress analyses) of the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, CFEM, 2013; Alpha method (total stress analyses) of the CFEM; a method based on piezocone tip resistances; "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" method (effective stress analyses); and finally, a method based on the results from the pressuremeters. In order to confirm the results, dynamic loading and pull out tests were carried out on three test piles. The results of this study showed that the Beta method, recommended by the CFEM, is very sensitive to the choice of the piles design parameters. The piezocone-based method gives the closest resistance values to those measured by the dynamic loading test.
Please include this code when submitting a data update: GEO2019_208
Access this article:
Canadian Geotechnical Society members can access to this article, along with all other Canadian Geotechnical Conference proceedings, in the Member Area. Conference proceedings are also available in many libraries.
Cite this article:
Menaa, Merouane, Ghlamallah, Noureddine (2019) Comparative study of several methods of axial design of piles located in a thick clay deposit: Pierre-de-Saurel wind farm case in GEO2019. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
@article{Menaa_GEO2019_208,
author = Merouane Menaa, Noureddine Ghlamallah,
title = Comparative study of several methods of axial design of piles located in a thick clay deposit: Pierre-de-Saurel wind farm case ,
year = 2019
}
title = Comparative study of several methods of axial design of piles located in a thick clay deposit: Pierre-de-Saurel wind farm case ,
year = 2019
}